四级模拟卷 1 · 仔细阅读（第2篇）打字练习
← 返回文章列表
📝 您未登录，本网站登录后完成练习可保存成绩、查看最佳记录。
总字符
0
正确字符
0
错误字符
0
错误率
0.00%
耗时(秒)
0
速度 WPM
0
The Internet has enabled the spread of information at lightning speed. This information revolution has created
tremendous business opportunities for online publishers, but not all of them maintain proper quality-control
mechanisms to ensure that only good information is being shared. Instead, many publishers aim simply to make
money by whatever means possible, with no regard for the implications for society at large.
When selfish publishers set up shops online, the primary goal is to publish as much as possible, often at the
cost of quality. In this respect, many publishers start numerous online journals focused on overlapping( 重 叠
的)disciplines—to increase their total number of published papers—and hire young business managers who do not
have any experience in either science or publishing. In some cases, online publishers even give up peer review,
while still presenting themselves as scientific journals—deception designed to take advantage of scientists who
If publishers structure their business to make more revenue, it often does harm to their products. When
publishers start journals with overlapping domains, in combination with the pressure to publish more studies, this
could promote the publication of marginal or even questionable articles. Moreover, publishers with multiple
overlapping journals and journals with very narrow specialties(专业)increase the demands on the time and efforts
of willing reviewers. With the fact that reviewers are generally not compensated for their time and effort, journal
editors are often unable to find enough reviewers to keep up with the increased publication rate.
To improve the situation and increase the trust in scientific community, the pressure to publish must be
reduced. Funding and promotion decisions should not be based on the number of publications, but on the quality
of those publications and a researcher’s long-term productivity and instructions.
And that’s just the start. We need additional mechanisms, such as Beall’s list of predatory(掠夺的)publishers,
to alert scientists to fake journals and fake articles. In addition, the price for online publication must be controlled
and a mechanism must be put in place to honor and reward hard-working reviewers.
对照上方逐行输入，绿色=正确、红色=错误